Wednesday, July 1, 2015

7076 Miles, 41 Days, 10 Sets of Underwear Trip - First Part!



Abe Berkowitz Boardroom in Birmingham Office of Baker-Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell and Berkowitz.
===
Lynn and I recently completed a cross country drive from Savannah to Los Angeles and then we returned by way of Oklahoma.

The purpose of the trip was many fold.  When we were told by our grand daughter in law that she  was receiving her PHD from UCLA,  that triggered our decision to drive coast to coast.

Second, as many of you know, I have been a Board Member of The State Museum of Art (GMOA) housed on the University Campus in Athens for many, many years and our love of art is evident.  I have hosted at least 4 visits to Athens and other museum sites since moving to The Landings and Chair the Acquisition and Deaccession Committee of our museum.  I asked our Director, Bill Eiland, to send me a list of museums he thought would be important for us to visit and which would help me better serve the museum because we have an Art Acquisition Foundation which we established many years ago and continue its funding for the purpose of purchasing art for future generations of Georgians. Bill sent me a list of some 14 museums he thought were must sees.  Also, he previously suggested we extend our Foundation to include the purchase of drawings,  which we have done.

The third reason for making our trip by car is that I served on the Board of St John's College for some eight years and during my tenure we established two named Scholarship Funds for graduate and undergraduate students and wanted to discuss with the Santa Fe Campus' current president, Mike Peters, future funding matters.

The fourth reason we were willing to undertake an extensive trip is because we truly enjoy driving in a car due  to the flexibility it gives. We now have the time, the additional out of pocket cost need not exceed much more than what it does to  stay home and this is a great country and our 'bucket list' desire is to explore every state. We have some 15 or more yet to see.

Our past drives have provided us with a greater love of our country, a greater appreciation of its grandeur and we have met some wonderful characters and enjoyed some unusual and unexpected discoveries.

Finally, I have come to resent the way airlines have become bloodthirsty in terms of their policies of charging for everything except the life jacket under your seat.  I understand why costs creep up over time but I believe the air line industry has chosen to model  themselves after American Auto makers of yore.  They thought they could make anything, sell it and damn the customer.  Throughout my career I have believed in service first and the rest would take care of itself.

We had dinner with one of my father's former partners in Birmingham this past Sunday.  Chervis Isom, wrote a book recently entitled "Newspaper Boy." He will come some time in the Fall and will talk about his auto-biographical exploration of his life. The reason I mention this is that I inquired what motivated Senator Baker to want to acquire my father's firm and Chervis said Baker-Donelson were a client oriented firm and  were equally impressed with the way my father's firm put their client's interests first as well as being an established firm doing quality work.

(This is an e mail I received from a former partner of my father who is now with another fine firm in Birmingham.  I invited him to dinner, as well but, he had a prior commitment.

"Dick, I spent all of yesterday (and part of the evening) in a deposition in the Abe Berkowitz Board Room at the Birmingham office of Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz.  It is a very impressive room, just off the main reception area.  I believe it is the largest conference room in the firm's Birmingham office."

"The attached photograph displays memorabilia regarding your father that is displayed in the room - see above"

We left mid afternoon May 20 with our goal of arriving in Mobile late that evening.  This was one of our longer drives because on average we drove around  175 miles per day.

Before reaching Mobile we detoured twice.  Once to drive through Auburn's beautiful and expanding campus. Later that afternoon we drove through Tuskegee University.  We have visited both campuses in the past and they are larger than our last visit.  Obviously Auburn has more resources and is expanding at a faster pace and all the new construction is in brick and makes the campus truly elegant.

We arrived late that night and our reason for starting in Mobile is that  we have a dear friend who lives there and whose husband was my college class mate and president of my college fraternity. Mayer Mitchell .died prematurely of cancer but before he departed he became one of the the most politically influential Southerners in our country.  He was President of AIPAC, served on many local boards and was one of Mobile's most charitable citizens.  The University of Alabama, in Mobile, is a benefactor of his families' generosity and Arlene, his wife, continues his legacy of being an exceptional citizen.

The next morning we were met by Arlene's son-in-law who became our chauffeur and we could not have had a better one because he was also the Concierge of the Hotel where we were staying.  He gave us a tour of the city. taking to the to various institutions "Bubba" supported - The Mayer Mitchell Cancer Center, The Arlene Mitchell Children's Hopsital, The University of Alabama at Mobile (Bubba's Brother Abe donated the business school building),  Spring Hill College, their local Synagogue and many other civic institutions.

Arlene met us for lunch, Then we  enjoyed a private tour of the Contemporary Museum by the museum director Bob Seine, who joined us for dinner that evening.  Their current exhibition focused on works by black artists and was assembled by an Atlantan, from whom we had purchased some of our own African artifacts many years earlier.  William Arnett shifted his focus from African artifacts to works by local black, mostly untrained and undiscovered artists and due to his efforts many of them have been recognized by the top museums in our country as overlooked  leaders .  The Modern Museum of Art (MOMA) has begun collecting works by these artists and The Brenda and Larry Thompson collection at GMOA includes many of these artists as does GMOA's own collection.

That evening we had a delightful, informative and relaxed dinner at one of Arlene's special restaurants - NOLA.

The next morning we said our goodbyes and proceeded to Folsom, La. but before we did we visited the Mobile's beautiful museum situated overlooking  a lovely city park lake.. The collection is modest but quite representative of the artists displayed and I suspect, one day, some of Arlene's exquisite collection will grace their walls.

Why Folsom, La.? which is some 20 miles north of New Orleans which was our second city destination.

Again, another story.  In the early 1960's, after I had become a partner in Courts & Co., the then largest Southeastern based NYSE Member Firm, one of my partners, Richard Harris, who was in charge of the firm's trading department , was an avid art collector with a primary focus on Western Art. Dick told me The Sears' Vincent Price Art Collection was coming to town and were offering an Andrew Wyeth water color.  We agreed we would buy it jointly  and switch back and forth having it in our respective homes.  Well the price was above what we (mostly me) could afford so I purchased a water color by Rolland Golden of his wife, Stella.  After my acquisition I contacted Rolland and we have been friends ever since.  In fact, the summer before Katrina, we visited with Stella and Rolland and purchased a lithograph from his own personal and retained collection.

Rolland has become one of the south's finest water colorist, was recently honored as Visual Arts Honoree by the State of Louisiana at the Louisiana Legends 25th Annual Gala in May of this year, featuring his  Katrina Series. Earlier, Rolland's works were featured in a show in Russia  sponsored by our State Department . His works hang in many fine southern museums and  while I was there I was able to arrange for a dear gallery friend in Chevy Chase, Md.  to consider taking Rolland on as one of his featured artists. My friend represents March Avery, daughter of  Milton Avery, one of America's finest artists. We own works by Milton, Sally (his wife) and March.

Rolland recently wrote an autobiography  entitled: "Rolland Golden - Life. Love and Art In The French Quarter."  It is a beautiful story of his life,  love of his family and continuing  love affair with Stella, who has stood by him throughout his long but not always easy days as a serious artist.  Stella remains his agent and one of his daughter's, Lucille, also helps sponsor and market her dad's work.

Dinner at Morton's in Madisonville,  with the three Golden's that evening was delightful because we were able to observe the interaction among the three and the Cajun food was tasty.. Place was packed.

Rolland is not in the best of health, he has some memory loss issues, but his hand is steady, he continues to paint every day and is working on a second autobiography bringing the reader up to date. He retains a delightful sense of the Cajun world surrounding him, because it  is in his DNA.

As for my first acquisition by Rolland entitled "Fisherwoman," it depicts a harsh fisher lady sitting on a dock with a wooden boat as background. She is in jeans and her red hair is cut short. Her features are less than soft.  If you turn to page 151 in Rolland's book there is a picture of Stella, the  knockout who caught the eye of the then Navy sailor, and she has aged beautifully.  Stella  remains the cement that Rolland depends upon and my wish is that GMOA will one day have a retrospective of this unique artist.  I am working with Bill on trying to arrange such. (Go to Rolland Golden Artist.Com if you want a wonderful experience.)

We spent two nights and three days in New Orleans, stayed at our favorite hotel -  The Windsor Court - walked our favorite French Quarter Streets,  ate at some new restaurants ( as long as they served crawfish, I was  amenable - Lynn lost a few quarters in The Harrah Casino slots and we purchased an African mask  in an antique store.  Weather was great.

From New Orleans we headed to Texas - Orange, Texas.  Why Orange Texas?  Because Bill Eiland told us it was a must visit and he was right.   Orange, Texas is a small town on the Texas-La. border.

The Stark Museum is a gem and its focus is on The Taos Artists.  The Stark Foundation was established by H.J. Lutcher Stark and his wife and funds  the beautiful and active  Stark
theater, their home, which we toured, and the magnificent  Stark Gardens  in the heart of town.

The museum is modern and has some of the finest works by  virtually all the TAOS artists - Sharp, Phillips, Berninghaus, Blumenschein, Farny,Couse,Dunton,Hennings etc. If you love Western Art ,  as we do,then The Stark is a little gem!

Our next destination was Galveston and, on the route,  we stopped for lunch in Winnie, Texas and had lunch at Al-T's and the etoufee and bread pudding were great. More unneeded calories.

Galveston is a town undergoing significant rehabilitation.  The largest structure in the town is a Federal Building. Activity along the wharf and port, where some excellent restaurants are located,  has slowed because oil drilling is down. Leon's is the best barbecue restaurant and is a must visit..

From Galveston we motored in the direction of San Antonio and the flooding and rain continued in the Dallas and Houston area . We wanted to have lunch in Victoria but the restaurant we chose on the river was closing by order of the city. The entire parking lot was under water when we arrived. We did drive around the historical district and Victoria is a little jewel of beautiful old homes, well manicured lawns and gardens and the downtown area is also undergoing  an extensive  renaissance. We lunched at Fossati, one of the oldest delis in all of Texas then walked around town a bit and stopped by the Nave Museum.  This museum was begun by a local artist, is free to the public and houses not only his work but  they had a special show  of auto art.

San Antonio is one of America's unique cities.  Running through the heart of downtown is a beautiful canal surrounded by restaurants, boats traversing the canal and plenty of walking path areas.  San Antonio was hopping and once again the weather was great.  We explored the City by taking one of the many off and on bus tours which begin at The Alamo.  During the tour we got off for lunch at Auggies and then toured the nearby Antonio Museum. Auggie is another fantastic  Texas barbecue restaurant.  You line up, place your order, watch them construct what you ordered and then find your own table.

At a table next to ours were three working men in their construction attire and one ordered a sandwich which had to be at least a foot in height.  I was so busy watching him, my own more downsized fare got a little cold.

The city  museum is another surprise. Again not extensive but very interesting and the descriptions were very informative. Before we left San Antonio we went to the McNay Museum (The first modern museum of art in Texas) and the Briscoe. The McNay is magnificent and incorporates the founder of the museum's home.  The collection is outstanding and varied and the facility has massive new wings displaying large contemporary paintings by some of America's most recognized artists and sculptors.  While there we observed a constant flow of future brides having their pictures taken in the surrounding gardens.

We cabbed to the McNay and then to the Briscoe, which is housed in the old  Carnegie Library, and a beautiful building in its own right. The art displayed was varied and all Western, a copy of a stage coach, many Native American artifacts, plenty of  old west  artifacts.  This too is a must visit for anyone who loves Western Art.  As we left, the rain came down in torrents so we cabbed back to our hotel.

I thought San Antonio, which I had visited for business reasons shortly after it hosted the World's Fair, was unique and it is but when we got to Oklahoma City we were surprised to find another man made canal coursing through "Brick Town."

Austin was a short drive from San Antonio and we stayed with Matt Ford, his wife and their two beautiful daughters.  Matt lived in our Atlanta neighborhood and was our son's best man as was Daniel when Matt married.  In fact, Daniel was due to visit with Stella but a business closing prevented him from joining us. Matt and Jenny had previously worked  for Dell  Computer, but Matt was now doing consulting on his own and Jenny has a responsible position as the person in charge of keeping Wall Street Analysts apprised of  the happenings at a large publicly held company.  Their two daughters are absolute dolls and the way Matt and Jenny speak to them serves as a model for how to relate to kids, make them feel loved, informed and significant members of their family unit. The family pooch is a breed I never knew existed and is as sweet and loving as are the entire Ford family.  It is always great to see old friends doing well and making their own way through life.

We visited the University of Texas Campus.(my second daughter, Amy attended U.T and met her husband, Steve, there. They now live in Louisville where Steve is Chairman of The Republic Banks.)

The University Museum, The Blanton Museum, is huge and has some fine art.  The collection of contemporary art was particularly good.  Much of the University's collection was assembled,  owned and eventually given by James Michener, the great author who attended the University as an undergraduate. It is an unbelievable and diverse collection and reflects Michener's obvious discerning taste and love of contemporary art. (Michener;s own museum housing his remaining art collection is in Doylestown, Pennsylvania.)

The large foyer of the Blanton was given by a dear friend of my father who owned a private insurance company and Chaired the powerful Texas Board of Regents. Barney Rappaport, was one of eighteen members of The Sonneborn Institute of which my father was a member.  The Sonneborn Institute was started by Rudy Sonneborn, a New York  Industrialist, and its espoused  purpose was to arm and prepare The State of Israel prior to its birthing by The U,N.  President Truman knew what was going on and sent an FBI Agent to Birmingham to pay a visit to my father and to urge he be discreet about purchasing  war surplus arms from southern scrap dealers. The story is told in : The Pledge by Leonard Slater and might one day become a documentary film made by Steven Spielberg's sister.

I once visited Barney to discuss the possibility of whether he might wish to merge his company but he was not interested.  Also, wherever we went in Texas, I noticed one of the son's of my former client was listed a significant donor.  Mark Rachofsky has a magnificent contemporary collection of his own which is housed in his Richard Neutra designed  Dallas home.

After leaving Austin, the  bustling capital city of Texas which is, full of young people, new construction etc. our next destination was, what turned out to be one of my favorite Texas cities - Fort Worth.  Oil wealth and oil generosity has turned this city into a beautiful place to live. They have a great water park in the heart of down town, another lovely park along the edge of town on a river and three absolutely world class museums - The Amon Carter, The Kimbell and the Modern Art Museum of Ft Worth.  The first  focuses on Western Art and has a wonderful collection of all the most noted Western Artists whereas the Kimbell is world class and takes you through art from the early paintings of Christ all the way up to today's modernistic painting, ie from Rembrandt. through Cezanne and el Greco to Stella etc..  The museum is housed in two distinct structures which complement each other one by Louie Kahn the other by Piano.  The Modern Museum is also a striking building , is somewhat more limited in their display but when you exit the elevator on the second floor you are confronted by a fabulous self-portrait by Andy Warhol  There is a magnificent pool on the ground level of one wing and as you enter it is a perfect setting for the art displayed.

The city's fourth art museum, The Sid Richardson, was closed but it too possesses a fine collection of Western Art.

The first three museums I mentioned above  are all within walking distance of each other and are located in the cultural section which is an area of beautiful old homes and contemporary condominiums interspersed among lovely shops, restaurants, movie theaters etc.

Downtown Ft Worth is full of interesting buildings that span various periods and many have been rehabbed and turned into an outdoor eating area.  We happened to be there during graduation ceremonies of a local high school so parking was not easy but because of our handicap sticker it made it easier and we were able to park near the Philip Johnson water park which cascades down hundreds of feet of man made concrete and stone structures

From Fort Worth we headed towards Cleburne and  Fredericksburg by way of  Waco and Baylor University.

We love, during our travels, to visit college and university campuses and Baylor proved a small but lovely campus. Once again many of our colleges and universities are undergoing significant new building expansion(s) and this too was the case at Baylor - a new business school.

We were able to make Fredericksburg and tour The Admiral Nimitz Pacific War Museum. Whenever we have visitors I make sure, time permitting, they visit The 8th Air Force Museum.  I remember telling Kim Strassel she might like visiting the museum and to my surprise she not only said yes but also stayed almost two hours. Several of my military friend told me about The Nimitz Museum and one, Tom Dolson, asked me to pass along his personal regards to a former Commandant of The Marine Corps who maintains an office at the museum.  Alas, he was out f town so I left a note with one of the administrative staff and they said they would give it to him.

It is hard to describe the museum because it is extensive and encompasses the history of the entire Pacific War.  The films, the display of equipment, the entire presentation is just superb and for me brought back the names of the Islands, battles, the major participants etc.  I was 8 years old when Japan attacked Pearl Harbour and I remained glued to the radio for an entire 4 years while our troops went from Island to Island. recapturing and rescuing not only civilians but our own imprisoned prisoners.  Chester Nimitz was one of the great heroes of that War and we toured the home where he was born and lived for a while.  Nimitz was one of many but he was special and this museum is a brilliant testimony to him and those who fought, died, came home and helped us retain our freedom.

As for Frederickburg, it is a town settled by German immigrants, clean, as one would expect, full of shops, wine tasting stores, beer halls and restaurants.  We dined that evening in a small restaurant , ate outside in the courtyard and had a non-Texas meal. Speaking of wineries, I was amazed at the number of wineries in Texas.  We asked a restaurateur what he thought of Texas wines and said the whites were ok but the reds needed improving.

Next was Kerrville and The Western Art Museum which previously had been the Cowboy of America Museum. This was a particularly important visit for me because my former partner, Dick Harris (discussed previously), eventually left the firm and purchased the Jameson Gallery in Santa Fe. Dick also owned a ranch in Pagosa Springs, Colorado and every year the Cowboys of America had their official barbecue there. The Jameson Gallery was one of Santa Fe's best at the time Dick purchased it and he continued to maintain its stature.  I visited him shortly after he moved to the area and he urge I purchase a painting by William Moyer but even with Dick's discount I could not afford it, or thought I could not.  Big mistake, because not only was it a magnificent painting but I could not touch its cost today.  William Moyer was one of the best Cowboy of America artists.  He has passed but his son and son's wife continue to paint and are well recognized.

Shortly after the formation of the Cowboys of America they decided it would be beneficial to open a museum displaying their art.  Subsequently this museum began to branch out and introduced works by many local (Texas) artists and thus, changed its name to reflect same.  The museum is wonderful. Four rooms of fabulous paintings of some of the past greats , current greats. Once again, not only is art on display but a variety of other artifacts depicting life in the 'Old"  West.

I purchased a suite of  three lithographs, one by Gordon Snidow, Gary Niblett and John Hampton, with whom I am not familiar.  My problem now is where do I hang them. My "man's cave" is full of art hung salon type literally  running to the ceiling.

My dear friend, Charlie Bourland, told me a member of his family was the first to assemble what came to be known as the first  cattle  drive. The HBO special "Lonesome Dove," based on the book by Larry McMurty, depicted this historical event.

I inquired of the museum director if he had any art depicting same  and he showed me several displays of items used by those engaged in a cattle drive etc. But I could not remember the specific name  of Charlie's  relative.  When I returned home I told Bourland, I could not remember his relative's name so he relieved me of any future exploits, turned to Lynn and said he knew I would blow it. Sorry Charlie!

Kerrville is a small town of two or three very very long and parallel streets.  While we were there a show of some kind was taking place in one of the town squares. The town itself is obviously prosperous and many new contemporary buildings line the streets along with large shopping type malls.

Las Crusces is where Mexico State University is located and we toured the campus but their museum was closed. The town surprised us because it is larger than we thought and is undergoing extensive re-development including the main highway which cuts through the town.  We stayed in a Holiday Inn Motel, had dinner at a nearby  steak restaurant but drove around first to get our bearings.  While doing so we discovered the quaint town of La Mesilla.  It is not more than 6 or seven blocks and some outlying streets but is a small rendition of the classiest part of Santa Fe.  We made a note to return the next morning on our way to Arizona and we did. We also located the Las Crusces Contemporary Museum and made a note to return when it opened the next morning.

We returned to the Contemporary Museum first and toured a show of local artists and then headed towards La Mesilla.  We arrived   before their unique shops were open and good that it was so because they were interesting. The town is absolutely quaint, full of outdoor restaurants and cantinas, a lovely park area and surrounding the small shopping area are new condos, motels and other stype structures that obviously are home to a growing number of retirees.  La Mesilla is a must experience.

Lynn had heard about Marfa, Texas and had purchased some tickets to tour Donald Judd's Foundation and museum.  We booked a hotel in Alpine, some 25 miles before Marfa.

Donald Judd was an artist mainly known for his belief that museums constrained artists who needed more room to display their works.  He left New York, moved to Murfa and purchased a closed  military base that had both housed German prisoners of war from Gen. Rommel's forces  and was also a desert training base for our own military and air force.

Judd established the Chinati Foundation and invited some 8 artists friends to come and display their work in the 16 or so remaining buildings which housed German prisoners and our own military.  In the first two, Judd displays his own aluminum sculptured pieces and in the remaining buildings artists friends display their works ranging from neon lighting to cartoon like art and everything in between. Though I like Judd's work the rest of the art and object displayed left me cold.

We then toured Judd's home, studios and workshops all surrounded by walls in a compound,like area.
Judd was an avid reader and brilliant as evidenced by the, well over, 1300 or so books, pamphlets and journals displayed in crude shelves he built to house his storehouse of  eclectic reading material.

One day Marfa will expand and become a major artist commune.  It has already begun but being a Sunday many of the galleries were closed.  Marfa has the highest altitude golf course in Texas and our guide told us home prices were beginning to rise as the "wine and cheese, kool aid drinking crowd from New York" were beginning to discover Marfa.  It will be interesting to watch the Politically Correct crowd shove native Marfan's out of their town as everything gets pricier as happened in Santa Fe, leading to their election of a committed Communist as Mayor. Since the young lady was as incompetent as Obama, she was subsequently defeated. That said, a direct rail system was built from Albuquerque to Santa Fe and provides 1 1/2 hour transportation for those seeking work in Santa Fe but no loner able to afford living there.  Former native Santa Fe-ans owe their dispossession to the wine and cheese crowd flooding in California.

In Alpine we found a fine restaurant housed in an old historic hotel which had been refurbished ( a similar such hotel is in Marfa as well.)

There is a large university in Alpine which houses a museum devoted, in part, to the art of a local artist who also taught there.  A mural of his graced the wall of the restaurant I mentioned. Alas, it was closed  on Monday and we had to move along.

Now the first reason for doing this coast coast drive began in earnest as our final destination, Los Angeles,  demanded we be there for the family gathering and Elizabeth's PHD ceremony.

Ah, but we still had several days and more former Landings friends to visit.

Our next stop was Dragoon, Arizona to tour Amerind Museum and Gallery. The word  Amerind is a combination of American and Indian and was founded by William Fulton in 1937.  Fulton was Chairman of a Connecticut company and was an avid amateur archaeologist.  He established the Amerind Foundation and it is  dedicated to the preservation and interpretation of Native American Cultures and their histories.

The Museum houses an unbelievable collection of native American artifacts including pots, bead work, clothing , metal objects like knives, spears etc.  The two story building is beautiful and has some of the finest displays of any museum I have visited.  I listened and viewed a wonderful film on the life and history of Geronimo and the Navajo Indians. Marlon Brando was right,. America truly screwed the Indians. Even when the government  sought to help them they bureaucratically blundered because the decisions were made by those who could not stand in the moccasins of those they were trying to help.  The Department of Indian Affairs should be shut and the money saved  put in an education fund. Native American casinos and connecting hotels abound throughout the West.   Whether they make money I do not know.  They could provide a tribal income source coming from  personal Native American losses .  I just do not know.

Next to the museum is a wonderful Gallery displaying some of the magnificent paintings Fulton collected, ie. Remingtons', Russells' , O'Keefe etc. and a reconstruction  of his corporate office.

While there, we purchased a ceramic bowl by a native, Lidia Lucero, of  Mata Ortiz, Mexico, a community of beautiful contemporary potters.

Amerind is sited on a piece of land surrounded by a few homes of Native Americans and is a must stop for anyone interested in Native American artifacts and history. Before reaching Amerind there is a unique guest ranch.  We drove in thinking their restaurant would be open and as we did there were signs along the way indicating famous people who had been guests - John Wayne, Glenn Ford, Barbara Stanwyck etc, We were told their restaurant is only open to non ranch guests on Saturday.

One of the Amerind staff members gave us the name of and directions to a wonderful restaurant in Benson - Mia Casa. The restaurant is not easy to find even though it is on the town's main street because it is set way back.  It is owned by a couple, the wife cooks, the husband serves.  They feature authentic home made Mexican food and the carrot cake is outstanding.  Her husband, I concluded , had been in  the Marine Corps so we struck up a conversation and he told us about their oldest son who, after graduating from The Univ. of Arizona, had been preparing for two years to apply to become a Navy Seal..

He admitted living in a tiny town had drawbacks but they believed it was great for raising kids because you were in touch with their friends, knew what was happening in their lives etc,

One thing we found interesting was when we drove from New Mexico into Arizona we were stopped by Border Security, they looked in our car cursorily and asked were we citizens.  We said yes and they waived us along. I think we were being profiled.

We arrived in Tuscon in time for dinner with  Susan and Bob Helpert, who we knew from our Atlanta Days and renewed our relationship when we moved to The Landings where they had moved a year before..  They hosted us when we arrived with a lovely party which  included some of their friends who subsequently became ours.  In fact my piano teacher was on  their guest list.

The next day we toured the Tuscon Museum which began as part of the home of a local  resident and then a separate building was built which now houses a significant part of their collection. However,
their spectacular Western collection remains in the original home and attached buildings and what a wonderful collection it is.  Limited but high quality and all the great Western art names. We ate in the adjoining museum restaurant and were joined by Tom and Nancy Gates, also former Landings friends and tennis players. Anyone touring the museum would be wise to also eat  there because it adjoins the museum and offers free parking.

The Helperts have a lovely home magnificent mountains facing the front, a wonderful walled garden area adjoining their living and dining room which face the community golf course.  They have done a superb job of landscaping and just about everything grows if you provide some water.  The Gates live in a different area .  Both couples moved to Tuscon to be closer to family and to have another experience.

From Tuscon ,we drove to Palm Desert and again were house guests of former Landings' friends and tennis players - Mike and Dorothee Bryman.  They have a beautiful home  purchased from a doctor who made significant upgrades.  They also have a lap pool and seem very happy with their move. We went to dinner in  a great restaurant part of the nearby magnificent , very upscale, shopping  area. Mike is very accomplished when it comes to making furniture. He has a complete work shop in his garage and has added a few pieces to  to many he made for their home at The Landings.

The drive to Los Angles was somewhat harrowing, partly because of the traffic, partly because of the confused signage and partly because I truly hate large cities.

This is the first part of our trip and I will make a few overall observations. Lynn is still working through pictures so they will be sent as part of the final part of my postings.

We did an extensive tour of Mississippi, along their Gulf Coast, looped virtually all of mid to southern Louisiana, and returned home buy way of Alabama and Florida's Gulf the summer before Katrina.  Thus, we were interested in the area's rebuild but were sadly disappointed.  Much of the developed area is now barren and where some of the magnificent and old homes were once located they have been replaced by ugly fast food structures and other garish stores. It is sad to see.
From all indications it appears the area may never return to the gracious beauty evidenced by old homes, beautiful magnolias  etc.

The drive through the southern part of Texas is mostly rolling, the legal speed limit was a surprise. - 85 in many areas and 75 in most.  Even 65 prevails on most  Texas roads. Road construction and repairs seemed continuous.  When we arrived in Galveston winds were strong and the Gulf waves were high.  Our hotel was across the street from the beach and Galveston has a very long stretch along the Gulf ending in a large amusement development and then beyond an entire new area with massive condominiums and a large number of individual homes under construction.

Though you think of Texas as flat we drove mostly in rolling Hill Country.  Cattle,wineries and various crops, mainly corn, predominate.

We passed through areas where President Johnson's  ability to fund parks, golf courses, schools etc.
were quite evident.

As we moved further west Texas' topography changed from rolling to less green and more cacti etc.

As we touched the lower edge of New Mexico the topography is stark, the mountains are high and colorful.  The roads are not as good as in Texas but hey are adequate. Speed limits hover between 75-60. When we were in Dragoon we actually saw a Roadrunner run in front of out car.

If you do not go to a fancy restaurant and stay away from fast food establishments,(we only went to three during the entire trip) the cost of gas, food and motels should not exceed $250 if you go 200 miles a day.

Obviously when we drove through California it was lush but we saw places where the water shortage had severe impact. We were told entire areas had browned and this would impact future availability of avocados and other types of vegetables and fruits etc.

I was surprised to see fruit trees, grape vineyards and nut groves in Texas . I suppose that is why Orange Texas is so named.

We truly lucked up weather wise but did encounter evidence of more rapid flowing rivers as we approached Waco and the area near Dallas.

America is one of God's kindest creations. We are blessed i so many ways and it is little wonder that Americans are a different breed.

I would urge anyone who has not seen our country to fine a way to do so within budget and physical constraints.

The Second Part of this recap will cover our time in California and return by way of California, New Mexico, Arizona, Oklahoma, Tennessee and Alabama.

Dick







2016 Reckoning and Seminal Election!


THE CLOCK (What a great gift!)
This is something that you have wanted for a long, long time. You might not have known you wanted it, but when you see it, you will save this in a file and refer back to it often. It will become one of your most prized possessions and it will give you much pleasure. Because it gives you so much pleasure, you will want to share it with your friends, so that they also will receive and enjoy it as much as you do.
====
Sowell on SCOTUS's Disasters! (See 1 below.)
===
What is happening in Greece and will In Puerto Rico ,is a warning for America.  I have, along with a host of others, pointed out that our climbing debt will sink our nation.  It is inevitable that even America can reach a point where no one will lend to us or accept our promise to pay and then it is tap city.

Obama continues to believe he can give free education, raise the minimum wage and dispense all his  other freebies with abandon because he will be gone and he can leave the mess, he expanded, to some other mortal.  Republicans also have not had the guts to bring pain so they too have spent with abandon.

Now that our very liberty is being challenged by a growing force of radical Islamist terrorists,  costs of protecting our nation will rise and it will take even more political courage to implement fiscal discipline.

It is ironic that Reagan outspent Russia and destroyed their empire and ability to match us in weaponry and now we have done the same to ourselves.

If you believe our banks cannot close, and if you believe our currency cannot sink then vote for Hillarious and her wildly liberal supporters  or avowed Socialist Bernie Sanders, who simply believes all we need do is raise  taxes on the rich.

If, on the other hand, you care for America and its fiscal health, then you have no choice but  to look to one of the Republicans and hope that he or she will win, have the will to lead a Republican Congress in a sane direction and they will have the guts to follow.

2016 is the last chance we have to clean up the mess we have allowed to occur. Maybe Franklin was right and we will not be able to retain our Republic. (See 2 below.)

And then there is Obama's pathetically  weak mastery of the Iranian negotiations among other debacles.

In a fast moving world it does not take long to undo years of painful building. (See 2a below.)
===
Me
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1) Supreme Court Disasters
By Thomas Sowell

The highest court in America has once again demonstrated that the freedom for which whole generations have fought and died is gradually but increasingly being taken away from us with smooth and slippery words.

Many people are looking at the recent Supreme Court decisions about ObamaCare and same-sex marriage in terms of whether they think these are good or bad policies. That is certainly a legitimate concern, for both those who favor those policies and those who oppose them.
But there is a deeper and more long-lasting impact of these decisions that raise the question whether we are still living in America, where "we the people" are supposed to decide what kind of society we want, not have our betters impose their notions on us.
The Constitution of the United States says that the federal government has only those powers specifically granted to it by the Constitution -- and that all other powers belong either to the states or to the people themselves.
That is the foundation of our freedom, and that is what is being dismantled by both this year's ObamaCare decision and last year's ObamaCare decision, as well as by the Supreme Court's decision imposing a redefinition of marriage.
U.S. Supreme CourtLast year's Supreme Court decision declaring ObamaCare constitutional says that the federal government can order individual citizens to buy the kind of insurance the government wants them to buy, regardless of what the citizens themselves prefer.
The Constitution gave the federal government no such power, but the Supreme Court did. It did so by citing the government's power to tax, even though the ObamaCare law did not claim to be taxing.
This year's ObamaCare decision likewise ignored the actual words of the law, and decided that the decisions of 34 states not to participate in ObamaCare Exchanges, even to get federal subsidies, would not prevent those federal subsidies to be paid anyway, to Exchanges up by the federal government itself.
When any branch of government can exercise powers not authorized by either statutes or the Constitution, "we the people" are no longer free citizens but subjects, and our "public servants" are really our public masters. And America is no longer America. The freedom for which whole generations of Americans have fought and died is gradually but increasingly being taken away from us with smooth and slippery words.
This decision makes next year's choice of the next President of the United States more crucial than ever, because with that office goes the power to nominate justices of the Supreme Court. Democrats have consistently nominated people who shared their social vision and imposed their policy preferences, too often in disregard of the Constitution.
Republicans have complained about it but, when the power of judicial appointment was in the hands of Republican presidents, they have too often appointed justices who participated in the dismantling of the Constitution -- and usually for the kinds of social policies preferred by Democrats.
Chief Justices appointed by Republican presidents have made landmark decisions for which there was neither Constitutional authority nor either evidence or logic. The first was Earl Warren.
When Chief Justice Warren said that "separate educational facilities are inherently unequal," he was within walking distance of an all-black public high school that sent a higher percentage of its graduates on to college than any white public high school in Washington. As far back as 1899, that school's students scored higher on tests than two of the city's three white academic public high schools.
Nevertheless, Chief Justice Warren's unsubstantiated assumption led to years of school busing across the country that was as racially divisive as it was educationally futile.
Chief Justice Warren Burger, also appointed by a Republican president, gave us the "disparate impact" notion that statistical disparities imply discrimination. That notion has created a whole statistical shakedown racket, practiced by government itself and by private race hustlers alike.
And now Chief Justice John Roberts, appointed by George W. Bush, gives the federal government the power to order us to buy whatever insurance they want us to buy. With that entering wedge, is there anything they cannot force us to do, regardless of the Constitution?

Can the Republicans -- or the country -- afford to put another mushy moderate in the White House, who can appoint more mushy moderates to the Supreme Court?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2) Beyond the Greek Impasse
The Greek situation — having perhaps outlived the term "crisis," now that it has taken so long to unfold — appears to have finally reached its terminal point. This is, of course, an illusion: It has been at its terminal point for a long time.
The terminal point is the juncture where neither the Greeks nor the Germans can make any more concessions. In Greece itself, the terminal point is long past. Unemployment is at 26 percent, and more than 50 percent of youths under 25 are unemployed. Slashed wages, particularly in the state sector, affecting professions including physicians and engineers, have led to massive underemployment. Meanwhile, most new economic activity is occurring in the untaxable illegal markets. The Greeks owe money to EU institutions and the International Monetary Fund, all of which acquired bad Greek debts from banks that initially lent funds to Greece in order to stabilize its banking sector. No one ever really thought the Greeks could pay back these loans.
The European creditors — specifically, the Germans, who have really been the ones controlling European negotiations with the Greeks — reached their own terminal point more recently. The Germans are powerful but fragile. They export about a quarter of their gross domestic product to the European free trade zone, and anything that threatens this trade threatens Germany's economy and social stability. Their goal has been to keep intact not only the euro, but also the free trade zone and Brussels' power over the European economy.
Germany has so far avoided an extreme crisis point by coming to an endless series of agreements with Greece that the Greeks couldn't keep and that no one expected them to keep, but which allowed Berlin to claim that the Greeks were capitulating to German demands for austerity. This alleged capitulation helped Germany keep other indebted European countries in line, as financially vulnerable nations witnessed the apparent folly of contemplating default, demanding debt restructuring and confronting rather than accommodating the European Union.

Greece and the Cypriot Situation

For the Germans, Greece represented a dam. What was behind the dam was unknown, and the Germans couldn't tolerate the risk of it breaking. A Greek default would come with capital controls such as those seen in Cyprus, probably trade barriers designed to protect the Greek economy, and a radical reorientation of Greece in a new strategic direction. If that didn't lead to economic and social catastrophe, then other European countries might also choose to exercise the Greek option. Germany's first choice to avoid the default was to create the illusion of Greek compliance. Its second option was to demonstrate the painful consequences of Greece's refusal to keep playing the first game.
This was the point of the Cyprus affair. Cyprus had reached the point that it simply could not live up to the terms of its debt repayment agreements. The pro-EU government agreed under pressure to seize money in bank accounts holding more than 100,000 euros (around $112,000) and use that money to make good on at least some of the payments due. But assigning a minimum account balance hardly served to lessen the blow or insulate ordinary Cypriots. A retiree, after all, may easily have more than 100,000 euros in savings. And hotels or energy service companies (which are critical to the Cypriot economy) certainly have that much in their accounts. The Germans may have claimed the Cypriot banking system contained primarily Russian money, but — although it undoubtedly contained plenty of Russian funds — most of the money in the system actually represented wealth saved and used by Cypriots in the course of their lives and business. The result of raiding those accounts was chaos. Cypriot companies couldn't pay wages or rent, and the economy basically froze until the regulations were eventually eased — though they have never been fully repealed.
The Germans were walking a fine line in advocating this solution. Rather than play the pretend game they had played in Greece, they chose to show a European audience the consequences of genuine default. But those consequences rested on a dubious political foundation. Obviously the Cypriot public was devastated and appalled by their political leaders' decision to comply with Germany's demands. But even more significant, the message received by the rest of Europe was that the consequences of resistance would be catastrophic only if a country's political leadership capitulated to EU demands. Seizing a large portion of Cypriot private assets to pay public debts set an example, but not the example the Germans wanted. It showed that compliance with debt repayments could be disastrous in the short run, but only if the indebted country's politicians let it happen. And with that came another, unambiguous lesson: The punishment for non-compliance, however painful, was also survivable — and far preferable to the alternatives.

The Rise of Syriza

Enter the Coalition of the Radical Left party, known as Syriza, one of the numerous Euroskeptic parties that have emerged in recent years. Many forces combined to drive pro-EU factions out of power, but certainly one of them was the memory of the behavior of pro-EU politicians in Cyprus. The Greek public was well aware Athens would not be able to repay outstanding debt on anything even vaguely resembling the terms set by the pro-EU politicians. Cognizant of the Cypriot example, they voted their own EU-friendly leaders out, making room for a Euroskeptic administration.
Syriza ran on a platform basically committing to ease austerity in Greece, maintain critical social programs, and radically restructure the country's debt obligations, insisting that creditors share more of the debt burden. EU-friendly parties and individuals — and the Germans in particular — tended to dismiss Syriza. They were used to dealing with pro-EU parties in debtor countries that would adopt a resistant posture for their public audience while still accepting the basic premise put forth by Germany and the European Union — that in the end, the responsibility to repay debts was the borrower's. Regardless of their public platform, these parties therefore accepted austerity and the associated social costs.
Syriza, however, did not. A moral argument was underway, and the Germans were tone deaf to it. The German position on debt was that the borrower was morally responsible for it. Syriza countered that, in effect, the lender and the borrower actually shared moral responsibility. The borrower may be obligated to avoid incurring debts that he could not repay, but the lender, they argued, was also obligated to practice due diligence in not lending money to those who were unable to repay. Therefore, though the Greeks had been irresponsible for carelessly borrowing money, the European banks that originally funded Greece's borrowing spree had also been irresponsible in allowing their greed to overwhelm their due diligence. And if, as the Germans have quietly claimed, Greek borrowers misled them, the Germans still deserved what happened to them, because they did not practice more rigorous oversight — they saw only euro signs, just as the bankers did when they signed off on loans to Greece rather than restraining themselves.
The story of Greece is a tale of irresponsible borrowing and irresponsible lending. Bankruptcy law in European and American culture is a system of dualities, where expectations for prudent behavior are placed on both the debtor and creditor. The debtor is expected to pay everything he can under the law, and when that is ability is expended, the creditor is effectively held morally responsible for his decision to lend. In other words, when the debtor goes bankrupt, the creditor loses his bet on the debtor, and the loan is extinguished.
But there are no bankruptcy laws for nation-states, because there is no sovereign power to administer them. Thus, there is no disinterested third party to adjudicate national bankruptcy. There are no sovereign laws dictating the point where a nation is unable to repay its debt, no overarching power that can grant them the freedom to restructure debts according to law. Nor are there any circumstances where the creditor is simply deemed out of luck.
Without these factors, something like the Greek situation emerges. The creditors ruthlessly pursue the debtor, demanding repayment as a first priority. Any restructuring of the debt is at the agreement of creditor and debtor. In the case of Cyprus, the government was prepared to protect the creditors' interests. But in Greece's case, Syriza is not prepared to do so. Nor is it prepared, if we believe what the party says, to simply continue crafting interim lies with the country's creditors. Greece needs to move on from this situation, and another meaningless postponement only postpones the day of reckoning — and postpones recovery.

The Logic and Repercussions of a Grexit

A Greek withdrawal from the eurozone would make sense. It would create havoc in Greece for a while, but it would allow the Greeks to negotiate with Europe on equal terms. They would pay Europe back in drachmas priced at what the Greek Central Bank determines, and they could unilaterally determine the payments. The financial markets would be closed to them, but the Greeks would have the power to enact currency controls as well as trade regulations, turning their attention from selling to Europe, for example, to buying from and selling to Russia or the Middle East. This is not a promising future, but neither is the one Greece is heading toward now.
Many have made a claim that a Greek exit could lead the euro to collapse. This claim seems baffling at first. After all, Greece is a small country, and there is no reason why its actions would have such far-reaching effects on the shared currency. But then we remember Germany's primordial fear: that Greece could set a precedent for the rest of Europe. This would be impossible if the rest of Europe was doing well, but it is not. Spain, for example, has unemployment figures almost as terrible as Greece's. Some have pointed out that Spain is now one of the fastest-growing countries in Europe, which would be impressive if growth rates in the rest of Europe weren't paralyzed. Similarly, Spain's unemployment rate has fallen — to a mere 23 percent. Those who are still enthused about the European Union take such trivial improvements as proof of a radical shift. I see them as background noise in an ongoing train wreck.
The pain of a Greek default and a withdrawal from the eurozone would be severe. But if others see Greece as a forerunner of events, rather than an exception, they may calculate that the pain of unilateral debt restructuring makes sense and gives Greeks a currency that they can at last manage themselves. The fear is that Greece may depart from the euro, not because of any institutional collapse, but because of a keen awareness that sovereign currencies can benefit nations in pain — which many of Europe's countries are.
I do appreciate that the European Union was meant to be more than an arena for debtors and creditors. It was to be a moral arena in which the historical agony of European warfare was abolished. But while the idea that European peace depends on prosperity may be true, that prosperity has been lost. Economies rise and fall, and Europe's have done neither in tandem. Some are big winners, like Germany, and many are losers, to a greater or lesser degree. If the creation of a peaceful European civilization rests on prosperity, as the founding EU document claims, Europe is in trouble.
The problem is simple. The core institutions of the European Union have functioned not as adjudicators but as collection agents, and the Greeks have learned how ruthless those agents can be when aided by collaborative governments like Cyprus. The rest of the Europeans have also realized as much, which is why Euroskeptic parties are on the rise across the union. Germany, the country most threatened by growing anti-EU sentiment, wants to make clear that debtors face a high price for defiance. And if resistance is confined to Greece, the Germans will have succeeded. But if, as I think it will, resistance spreads to other countries, the revolt of the debtor states against the union will cause major problems for Germany, threatening the economic powerhouse's relationship with the rest of Europe.

2a)Column one: The Iranian-American nuclear project
Under President Barack Obama, the US has implemented policies toward Iran that are catastrophic for Israel specifically, for US Middle East allies more generally and for US national security itself.
Consider, first, the known details of the soon-to-be- concluded nuclear deal.
In an article published by The New York Times this week, Prof. Alan Kuperman explained that Obama’s central justification for the agreement – that it will lengthen Iran’s breakout time to the bomb from the current two months to 12 months – is a lie.
Based on nothing more than the number of centrifuges Iran will be allowed to possess and the amount of enriched uranium necessary to make a nuclear bomb, Kuperman demonstrated that far from prolonging Iran’s nuclear breakout time by 10 months, the deal will only prolong its breakout time by one month. In other words, the deal is worthless.
Actually it’s worse than worthless.
Wednesday, the Associated Press reported on the details of one of the agreement’s five secret annexes.
Titled “Civil Nuclear Cooperation,” the annex demonstrates that, far from merely failing to block Iran’s development of nuclear weapons, the deal will facilitate Iran’s development of nuclear weapons.
The leaked secret annex has two central components.
The first involves the underground uranium- enrichment facility at Fordow. Built inside a mountain, the Fordow complex is considered resistant to air strikes.
According to the AP report, the Iranians have agreed to re-purpose the installation from uranium enrichment to isotope production. In turn, the six powers have agreed to provide the Iranians with next-generation centrifuges to operate it. Yet, as the AP report makes clear, “isotope production uses the same technology as enrichment and can be quickly re-engineered to enriching uranium.”
In other words, the six powers will teach Iran how to operate advanced centrifuges capable of quickly enriching uranium in an installation that is protected from aerial bombardment.
The second section of the annex relates to the heavy-water reactor at Arak. The reactor, whose construction is near completion, will be capable of producing plutonium-based atomic bombs.
According to the AP report, the six powers have agreed to provide Iran with a light-water reactor that is less capable of producing bomb-grade plutonium.
Yet, as Omri Ceren from the Israel Project explains, a sufficient number of light-water reactors are capable of producing bomb-grade plutonium. Moreover, since the reactors are powered by uranium, the very existence of the light-water reactors provides Iran with justification for expanding its uranium-enrichment operations.
Then there are the US’s stated redlines in negotiations.
These have collapsed in significant ways over the past few weeks.
Because the US agreed that Iran can continue to enrich uranium, perhaps the most critical means of preventing Iran from acquiring military nuclear capabilities involve requiring Iran to expose all of its previous nuclear work that is still unknown, and requiring Iran to agree to unfettered inspections of is nuclear work and access to its personnel involved in its nuclear work on the part of UN nuclear inspectors.
Clearly, without meeting both requirements, Iran will be able to breach its commitments easily and the agreement will be worthless.
Due to the general understanding of these requirements, the administration’s public position has been that it will require Iran to both expose its previous nuclear work with possible military dimensions and permit the US unfettered access to all its nuclear installations.
For its part, Iran refuses to accept either demand.
Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei reiterated this refusal on Tuesday.
Rather than present Iran with an ultimatum that it either abide by these basic requirements or receive no nuclear deal, the administration abandoned its position.
Last week, Secretary of State John Kerry insisted that there is no reason for Iran to expose its previous nuclear work because, “We know what they did. We have no doubt. We have absolute knowledge with respect to the certain military activities they were engaged in. What we’re concerned about is going forward.”
This statement is a lie. As Yukiya Amano, the head of the UN’s nuclear watchdog IAEA, reiterated just weeks ago, “We don’t know whether they have undeclared activities or something else. We don’t know what they did in the past. So, we know a part of their activities, but we cannot [say] we know all their activities. And that is why we cannot say that all the activities in Iran [are for] peaceful purposes.”
Another key position that the Obama administration has staked out on behalf of the nuclear deal is that the sanctions that would be canceled under the deal are limited to those that were instituted in retaliation for Iran’s illicit nuclear program. The other sanctions, levied due to Iran’s illicit work on ballistic missiles, its support for terrorism and its human rights abuses, would remain intact.
But, on June 10, AP reported that the administration intends to cancel both the nuclear-related sanctions and those imposed due to Iran’s illicit ballistic- missile development. As a consequence, tens of billions of dollars will become available for Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps.
Then, there are Iran’s repeated breaches of sanctions restrictions. Under the Iran-North Korea Sanctions Act of 2006, the State Department is supposed to submit a report of sanctions violations to Congress every six months. This week Al-Monitor reported that the General Accounting Office issued a report blasting the State Department for failing to uphold its legal commitment. The last report submitted was in 2014 and its reporting covered the period up to 2011. The previous report had been submitted nearly two years earlier.
Among the reasons for the delays, according to the report, “Officials told the GAO that negotiations and relations with counties can delay the process.”
In other words, the State Department’s failure to uphold the law owes to the administration’s desire to shield Iran from further sanctions.
James Clapper, Obama’s director of national intelligence failed to list either Hezbollah or Iran as threats to the US in this year’s Worldwide Threat Assessment.
And the State Department has yet to submit its annual Human Rights Report. This failure is allegedly due to the administration’s reluctance to report on Iran’s miserable human rights record.
Not only does the Obama administration refuse to view Iran and its terrorist arms as threats to the US, this week Bloomberg reported that US forces in Iraq are arming, training and providing close air support for Iranian controlled Shi’ite militia and terrorist groups led by the commander of Hezbollah forces in Iraq Abu Mahdi al-Muhandis.
So, too, US forces deployed to the Taqqadum base in Anbar share the base with Shi’ite terrorist groups.
Several of the terror operatives are reportedly spying on US forces at the base. Terrorist commanders have participated in US operational briefings ostensibly provided to official Iraqi security forces.
As one senior administration official told Bloomberg, “Even if these guys don’t attack us… Iran is ushering in a new Hezbollah era in Iraq, and we will have aided and abetted it.”
Beyond rendering US forces in Iraq hostages of Iranian-controlled terrorists now sharing a base with them, US support for Iranian controlled militia, as well as its policy of only transferring military assistance to forces fighting Islamic State through the Iranian-controlled Iraqi government and security forces, has facilitated Islamic State’s territorial expansion.
As Jacob Siegel and Michael Pregent explained last month in the Daily Beast, a key reason for Islamic State’s success in Ramadi and Mosul is the Baghdad government’s refusal to arm Sunni militias. As they explained, the security forces, guided by Iran, will only fight in areas important to the Shi’ites. So they refused to defend Mosul or Ramadi.
Siegel and Pregent argued that if Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi were to arm Sunnis to fight Islamic State in Anbar province, he would likely lose the support of Iran and the militias, and so be ousted from power. Consequently, Sunnis who oppose Islamic State are no obstacle to the march of the jihadists.
By supporting the Iranian controlled government, and refusing to directly arm Sunni or Kurdish forces, the US is supporting Iran and its terrorist groups on the one hand and abetting Islamic State expansion on the other.
The nature and scope of the Obama administration’s collusion with Iran require us to draw a number of conclusions.
First, from an American perspective, under the Obama administration, the US has destroyed its reputation as a responsible and trustworthy ally. It has endangered its allies, its armed forces and its own national security.
The US alliance system in the Middle East has collapsed.
In the short term, all that Congress can do to check Obama is reject his nuclear deal with Iran with a twothirds majority. Although the possibility that a sufficient number of Democratic senators will oppose the deal to override a presidential veto is remote, it is critical that every resource be used to convince them to do so.
In the medium term, in order to secure US national security, the next president will have to cancel US acceptance of the nuclear deal with Iran. To this end, US Jewish groups and other organizations must demand that all presidential candidates – including Hillary Clinton – commit themselves to canceling the agreement in the event they are elected.
If the US fails to reverse Obama’s policies toward Iran in the next two years, it is hard to see how it will be able to rebuild its strategic posture in the future.
The pace of change in the region and the world is too rapid today to rely on past achievements as a basis for future power.
As for Israel, it is now clear that there is no “crisis” in Israel-US relations. The Obama administration is betraying Israel. The centerpiece of Obama’s foreign policy is his desire to transform Iran’s illicit nuclear program, which endangers Israel’s existence, into a legal Iranian-American nuclear program that endangers Israel’s existence.
Consequently, the last thing Israel should worry about is upsetting Obama. To convince fence-sitting Democratic senators to vote against Obama’s Iran deal, Israel should expose all the ruinous details of the nuclear agreement. Israel should let the American people know how the deal endangers not just Israel, but their soldiers, and indeed, the US homeland itself.
By doing so, Israel stands a chance of separating the issue of Democratic support for Obama from Democratic opposition to the nuclear deal. Obama wants this deal to be about himself. Israel needs to explain how it is about America.
At the end of the day, what we now know about US collaboration with Iran brings home – yet again – the sad fact that the only chance Israel has ever had of preventing Iran from getting the bomb is to destroy the mullahs’ nuclear installations itself. If Israel can still conduct such an operation, it makes sense for it to be carried out before Iran’s nuclear program officially becomes the Iranian-American nuclear project.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------